[nanomsg] Re: Compressing TCP streams
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:30:14 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/14 09:27, Martin Sustrik wrote:
> 2. Hop-by-hop compression. (This is what you mean AFAIU.) In this
> case there may be a common context, but the compression must be
> done within nanomsg and is, I reckon, protocol-specific (i.e.
> compression for reliable transports is going to be different from
> compression for unreliable transports etc.) If you are interested
> in this I would suggest creating a new transport, something like
> "TCP with compression".
Btw, I still believe something like websocket transport may be a good
idea. I also recall seeing some work on compressed websockets done in
IETF. I don't know whether it have amounted to anything in the end though.
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTjCgGAAoJENTpVjxCNN9Yj/4IAICD/AYoGjkvZbIG4smwNKzY
S/th3EHc42H0bCTKe7cpDy+v/WEB8ioiLZQWqqMck69y4P1GufPY84l9pAsKEXyJ
pMDQNbbKesQqutLdPUhXRcUZ7V/2rnKEAqDLagczGEQplCA//X3xoeQ8i6w/7/6A
Q6lmQ1t7fYI+5c+TqN9I3CKh9gdck0foawMtSaD1jS7UAIDYs9qpNIDsSoVcDobX
Ca6X55m49lCb3QgOcFhpEugMNlbn001xS6sWdvu/mSOZrlv2wklfq2+KHtbY5pZ3
MogLrJT9fntMm/x/ZBVnWUiBFYeVPGATyxSGhowvPmF4BcSkb8CP39Ps38HXRSE=
=BEKa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
