[nanomsg] Re: Broadcast protocol

  • From: Paul Colomiets <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:36:37 +0300

Hi Daniel,

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Daniel Krikun <dkrikun0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think I would use udp server that multicasts current data at, say, 30 hz,
> for the described use case.

The actual use case is name service for nanomsg. It means:

1. 30 times a second each process would compare set of addresses for
each socket to set of addresses received

2. Topologies can be pretty big, so multicasting the whole topology at
once may exhaust the buffer space

3. Our company have few tens of topologies in every single project

-- 
Paul

Other related posts: