[nanomsg] Re: Binding maintainers: Unused error codes

  • From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:31:05 +0200

On 27/08/13 17:26, Charles Remes wrote:
I believe the whole point of the nn_symbol function was to allow for binding 
authors working with dynamic languages to seamlessly support nanomsg without 
requiring access to header files which could change between releases. Secondly, 
the library is still alpha. There should be no concern at all for backwards 
compatibility at this point.

Yes. Just making sure that nobody will be hurt in the process in some obscure way.

Martin


Other related posts: