[nama] Re: Git ready
- From: Joel Roth <joelz@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: nama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 09:35:08 -1000
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:08:45AM +0200, Julien Claassen wrote:
> HelloJoel!
> If save foo, is the same as save -f foo , then shouldn't restore
> foo be the same as restore -f foo ?
"save foo" could do any one of save-to-file, tag, or branch
I don't see any way to choose. And I think save-to-file is not a good
default. Maybe user configurable?
> Otherwise: Great work. This is a powerful feature in place.
I've merged the git branch. You can issue git commands.
restore_state doesn't do anything new... yet
Looks like we'll have two types of save, autosave (for undo) and
user save.
Autosave:
change to 'undo' branch
save-and-commit
User save:
save/commit
change to $current_branch
git merge --no-ff undo
git branch -d undo
git checkout -b undo
Cheers, and thanks for your comments
Joel
> Warmly yours
> Julien
>
> 050e010d0f12010401-0405-0d09-030f12011a0f0d-
> Such Is Life: Very Intensely Adorable;
> Free And Jubilating Amazement Revels, Dancing On - FLOWERS!
>
> ******** Find some music at ********
> http://juliencoder.de/nama/music.html
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> "If you live to be 100, I hope I live to be 95 and 37 days,
> so I can be sure, there's someone at your site, who loves you."
> (Not Winnie the Puh)
>
--
Joel Roth
Other related posts:
