[muscle] Re: Quiet
- From: James Mansion <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: muscle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:19:40 +0000
david rene wrote:
For me, Muscle is very reliable, small and isn't gluttonous like actual new
protocol and transport technologies like XML and the others.
Thanks David - and others.
Like you I'm impressed by the practical efficiency of MUSCLE, I've been
sketching an idea of writing a book about small-scale service oriented
architecture using MUSCLE as the MOM of choice.
The biggest concern I have is that vistors to this mail list may get the
feeling that the sortware is unloved and that it is rather moribund -
except for Jeremy rolling out software that is essentially a current
snapshot of internal systems infrastructure. Whether or not the latter
is true - and I don't think it matters even if it is - the impression is
unfortunate.
If we could encourage some discussion that would be handy.
Perhaos - top 10 gripes? Something we can do to organise some
development around?
James
Other related posts:
