[mira_talk] RE Re: Reference vs. De novo assembly.
- From: Jorge.DUARTE@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: mira_talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 08:46:32 +0100
> If you don't use automated scaffolders, then getting rid of the junk
contigs
> is the way to go before transferring to gap4.
>
> Have a look at section "Next steps: what to do with the MIRA result
files?",
> subsection "Filtering of results"
>
> (currently at
> http://mira-assembler.sourceforge.net/docs/mira_usage.html#section_14
Hi Bastien,
i would like to try this on EST-like data, but apparently the average
coverage is only
available for contigs >5000bp.
Would it be possible to change this default value ?
Extracting the code which makes this report into a script (like
convert_project)
would be a nice utility ?
jorge.
Other related posts:
- » [mira_talk] RE Re: Reference vs. De novo assembly. - Jorge . DUARTE
