Bastien, > Whether you assemble the metagenome data in genome or EST mode would have been > interesting. It's done in genome mode. Do you see any advantage to treating it as EST? >> parameters = -SK:not=16:pr=95:mchr=8192 \ >> -CL:asjdc=yes > > I'm feeling uneasy about -CL:asjdc as sometimes it clips way too generously > and > I have not found out yet. That's one of the reasons why it's generally > switched > off by default. Thanks. I'll try a smaller test run with it off to see what happens. >> -AS:nop=6:mrpc=2 \ >> 454_SETTINGS -AL:mrs=95 \ >> 454_SETTINGS -CL:qc=yes:pec=yes > > Careful with -CL:qc as 454 base qualities somewhat shifted over the years. > Worst > case: too generous clipping. I normally keep the clips coming off the 454 > pipeline. You suggested somewhere before that the 454 pipeline clips are pretty good. So for all of my data, I went back to the SFF files and used 'sff_extract -c' to extract the data. Thanks, Torben -- You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html