[mac4theblind] Re: Bose link2, or jawbone big jam box?
- From: Linnette Whalen <linnettew@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "mac4theblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <mac4theblind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 19:46:12 -0400
Would have to say that I prefer the Jambox over the Bose. My husband have the
Bose and I used it quite a bit, but prefer the Jambox. Having the ability to
control some features from the unit is nice. If I could blend both units, it
would be the perfect unit. I would have to say that the Bose is the step child.
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 1, 2013, at 9:30 AM, "Kliphton" <kliphton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Okay, I have owned the big jam box, wasn’t blown away by like the rest of the
> general public. Right now it is only $239.99 on amazon. The Bose link2 is
> still sitting at $299.99 and gets a smidge of a higher review. Couple things
> to take in to context here. The Bose link2 got 4.5 out of 5 stars. The Big
> jam box got 4.4 out of 5 stars. The Bose has only been on the market since
> September, and the big jam box has been out since last May, almost a year.
> The big jam box has over 1200 reviews, and the Bose link2 only has 273. So
> personal preference is the key here. Jam box has speaker phone, Bose link2
> does not. Bose link shaped like a small book, big jam box shaped like a long
> rectangular box. Jam box sound can be updated via usb cord, and sound
> adjusted with a few button presses. Bose link has an app for the iMac, but
> saw nothing about firmware updates. I will have the Bose link2 in my hands
> tomorrow, so will be able to see if 1 out does the other. 1 thing a lot of
> reviewers said about the jam box, that the speaker phone took some quality
> away from the sounds of their music. Don’t know, but I am not big on speaker
> phones anyway since I live in a household of 7, and want to keep my few
> conversations private anyway. More of a texter than a talker. Anyway, is
> there anyone who has owned both that can add to this? If not, I will
> tomorrow.
Other related posts:
