Patrick Donnelly wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Mike Pall <mike-1206@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Anyway, I'm undecided on this part. Opinions welcome! > > It seems you don't understand the purpose of the functions, from your > earlier post: > > "But ... why is all of that necessary? Why serialize two functions > that obviously had to have a common parent? Why not serialize the > parent instead? That would avoid all of the logic." First ... your reply does not relate to the actual question I posed about the API/ABI issues. And I very well understand the purpose. But I still doubt it's an essential feature. The example you gave is easily solved by serializing the parent function. Where did I mention that? Ah. --Mike