Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit

From: Mike Pall <mike-1410@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:32:56 +0200

Florian Weimer wrote:
> From this, I infer that all valid userspace pointers on x86_64 are
> representable as lightuserdata values.

Solaris also uses the negative x64 address space in user mode (for
stacks and default mmap). I have no plans to deal with this oddity.

--Mike

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit
  - From: Theo Schlossnagle

References:
- Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit
  - From: Nicholas Hutchinson
- Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit
  - From: Alex
- Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit
  - From: Alex Wilson
- Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit
  - From: Florian Weimer

Other related posts:

» Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit- Nicholas Hutchinson
» Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit- Alex
» Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit- Alex Wilson
» Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit- Nicholas Hutchinson
» Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit- Karel Tuma
» Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit- Florian Weimer
» Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit - Mike Pall
» Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit- Florian Weimer
» Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit- Theo Schlossnagle
» Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit- Florian Weimer
» Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit- Sean Conner
» Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit- Florian Weimer
» Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit- Theo Schlossnagle
» Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit- Sean Conner
» Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit- Sean Conner
» Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit- Javier Guerra Giraldez
» Re: Workarounds for LuaJIT's 4GB limit- René Rebe