Wednesday, October 6, 2004, 12:17:15 AM, William Ball wrote: WB> Judy, WB> I know less than anything about Kant.=20 Thank goodness! Judy WB> -----Original Message----- WB> From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx WB> [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Judy Evans WB> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 4:19 PM WB> To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx WB> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: [lit-ideas] RE: [lit-ideas] aret=EA - Greek for WB> virtue (was: Query) WB>> Also, a colleague of mine reminded me that "virtue" has to do with WB> the WB>> idea of being manly, 'vir,' WB> as in virtu in Machiavelli? where fortune is a woman... ! WB> I think arete would be a virtue, not virtue. But indeed (RH) one WB> might speak of the virtue of an object lying in its use-full-ness. WB> Arete is not gender specific WB> and WB> I don't know anything about Kant! -- Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK mailto:judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html