**So, can similar logic be then applied to the current (pseudo) president who's taking his minder (whoops, VP) to the 9-11 investigating committee with him?? WMDs [wink, wink]; political favors to the oil companies, Haliburton, Enron -- "who me??" [wink, wink]; "I showed up regularly to serve with my National Guard unit." [wink, wink]; "Dick Clarke never met with me." [wink, wink]; "We have evidence of Iraqi links with El-Queda [wink, wink]...?? TC, /Steve Cameron, NJ Scribe1865@xxxxxxx wrote: > When Clinton said he "didn't inhale," some part of the public assumed it was > a lie, but liked Clinton anyway because: > (1) Clinton's feigned innocence was an ironic statement -- "I know you know > I'm lying and that makes us equals" --- which acknowledged the laws were > unfair > and stupid, BUT that citizens had to pretend the laws weren't unfair and > stupid, because so much depended on the pretense, namely > > (2) Clinton's career as President (and by extension the public's careers in > general) were in service to some larger falsehood that would take away the > Presidency (and by extension many careers) if they told the truth or tried to > change the laws. The drug testing industry was getting into full swing. > > (3) Hence the -wink, wink- Clinton made ("did not inhale") told such people > that he was on their side, that he was in the same boat, subject to the same > hypocritical and unfair rules, which were beyond democracy, beyond activist > reform of legislation, or appeal, and which one had to pretend to agree with > and > support even while knowing they were arbitrary and stupid. > > (4) Yet these laws weren't harmless because thousands and thousands of people > were having their lives ruined by the laws, so after the -wink, wink- was > over as a news story, Clinton turned back to signing legislation that > significantly decreased individual privacy and put everyone -- Colombian > mafia killer and > former Woodstock hippie -- in the same boat. > > Some intense damage to the public trust happened here, something new in the > way of metacommunication and levels of irony. > > A President, doesn't matter which party, is in effect telling the citizenry: > "You and I both know this pot story of mine is a lie, but we have to pretend > it's true, because if any of us admits it's false, corporations and other > groups will punish us. So watch me for cues on how to pretend. Meanwhile, my > -wink, > wink- should encourage you by telling you that I suffer under its yoke too, > even though I will never admit the truth in so many words, even as I > intensify > its cruel mandates." > > > Eric > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html