On 2005/07/21, at 2:37, Eric Yost wrote:
JM: What all of these arguments evade, of course, is the principle of international law that forbids invasion of a sovereign state's territory in the absence of a prior attack from that state or, stretching a point, a clear and present danger.
EY: But in a war, almost anything can be cited as a "clear and present danger." How about the British pre-emptive intervention in Iraq in 1941? The Nazis were planning to secure the country so as to disrupt the Egypt-India air routes of the Allies.
John ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html