[lit-ideas] Re: another really old poem

  • From: JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:04:23 EDT

I've wondered myself at what the common thread is that ties together the  
poetry that compels me.  Usually it's contemporary, but not always.   Usually 
it's edgy, but not always.  What commonality do Sharon Olds, Naomi  Shiab Nye 
(god, I'd forgotten about her!), James Wright, Paz, Neruda, Cummings,  Sexton 
(NOT Plath!), Eliot, Rilke, Celan have?  Somehow I think all my  poets manage 
to 
communicate the spiritual, sometimes entirely abstractly, and  sometimes via 
the entirely quotidian and mundane.  Btw, would anyone here  consider Edmund 
Jabes to be a poet?  There is certainly poetry in some of  his books ....  
Levinas?  I do know that I have an aversion to the  Robert Frostian poets.  
They 
strike me as saccharine and soft,  pablum.  Does that make me cynical?  Jaded?  
Simply  ignorant?  Probably all three.  
 
Julie Krueger
always trying to quantify & organize and it doesn't work ....there  ain't no 
unified field theory.
========Original  Message========     Subj: [lit-ideas] Re: another really 
old poem  Date: 4/11/05 12:50:45 A.M. Central Daylight Time  From: 
_atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)   To: 
_lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(mailto:lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)   Sent on:    
Old poems by a young poet.  Poetry as  documentary.  That's what I'd like to 
investigate.  Picking up any  collected work, I'm always intrigued whether 
I'll like the young passionate  poet (sometimes the young pretentious poet), 
the ironic middleaged one  (sometimes the besotted one) or the old, crochety, 
dispassionate, wise one  (sometimes the passionate one).  I wish I had kept 
better notes.   But in fact, I've kept none at all.  I'm guessing that my 
preferences  probably varied with my own stage of life at the moment.  But I 
don't  know that.  I know that much of the very early Merwin I dislike -- I  
think he was trying to prove he could write what everyone else was writing  
at the time, but then he suddenly went his own way, nevertheless, his way  
has continued to change.  How he writes now is very different from  pieces 
like Departure's Girlfriend, which I posted earlier.  I love  that poem and 
chose it because the images are so vivid but the theme and its  emotional 
content are not so readily analyzable, you're not exactly sure  what's going 
on.  Even the title itself is more complex than I like to  get on an average 
day.  I wish I had the time to sit down and really go  through his works and 
trace the aesthetic and psychological development in  him  -- but who would 
take care of all these air conditioning problems  if I did that?  Choices, 
choices, choices.  Err on the side of  comfort, I always say.  And no doubt, 
some day some dissertation-hungry  English major will pick up the collected 
works of Eric Yost and do just such  a tracing out of his life.  And perhaps 
in his research he'll uncover  this post wherein I confess to much 
fellow-feeliing and kinship with these  two poems.  Remembering how I too 
once would release bugs back into the  world where they belonged -- which 
sure as hell wasn't my world! --   rather than annihilate them.  They have as 
much right to be here as I  do, after all.  But now, I'm more like William  
Stafford:

Travelling through the dark I found a deer
dead on the  edge of the Wilson River road.
It is usually best to roll them into the  canyon:
the road is narrow; to swerve might make more dead.

By glow of  the tail-light I stumbled back of the car
and stood by the heap, a doe, a  recent killing;
she had stiffened already, almost cold.
I dragged her off;  she was large in the belly.

My fingers touching her side brought me the  reason -- 
her side was warm; her fawn lay there waiting,
alive, still,  never to be born.
Beside that mountain road I hesitated.

The car aimed  ahead its lowered parking lights;
under the hood purred the steady  engine.
I stood in the glare of the warm exhaust turning red;
around our  group I coud hear the wilderness listen.

I thought hard for us all -- my  only swerving --
then pushed her over the edge into the river.
***

And though your soul screams No! in thunder, there you are,   always the 
prisonier of choices.  So Eric like I, like so many lovers  of life saved 
countless millipedes for the epicurean delight of shrews,  frogs, lizards, 
bettles and birds.  But our hearts were in the right  place.  I'm sure of 
that.  Spiders though, I'll kill without  thinking.

Twenty years ago I used to love to watch The Young Ones -- a  BBC comedy 
series if you're not familiar with it.  Four college guys  living together 
(in England).  A hippy, a lady's man, an anarchist and  a punk rocker.  It 
was quite absurd and hopelessly silly, but I loved  it wildly.  Nevermind 
that I was 42 years old then and cracking up like  a teenager.  I should have 
been embarrassed.  Arrested development  and all that.  But I wasn't.  I 
chose to believe that when  something comes alive in you, it's its own 
justification -- there's no need  to explain anything.  You just go with it, 
goddamnit.  That's what  poetry can be, I think.  You can love a poem that 
you know you don't  understand, but still feel it speaking to you at some 
level, rhythm,  euphony, perhaps only in an image that grabs you by the shirt 
front and  shakes you, something there in the language that shouts Listen up. 
The late  Victorians thought that poetry would one day replace religion. 
What a  terrible thing that would be.  There's no claim of truth in poetry, 
no  grounding, no ethical/moral prescriptions, just fascination and wonder 
and  fun and enormous sorrow.

OK, Sunday's over now.  No more  sermonizing.  Sorry.
Mike Geary
Memphis


----- Original  Message ----- 
From: "Eric Yost" <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:  <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 10:31  PM
Subject: [lit-ideas] another really old poem


> One  Idea
>
> No ideas but in things like ideas;
> no things but in  ideas of things.
> The millipede climbing a lemon peel
> on a dusty  red carpet is a thing
> without ideas, but an idea
> of a thing  gives me the idea
> to crush the thing, outlined,
> as it is, by the  soft white pulp
> of the lemon peel, outlined as
> the idea of  something out of place,
> its legs flexing, eyelash thin,  reckoning
> between yellow rind and white pulp.
> The idea of the  millipede touches
> my idea of myself. I grab lemon peel
> and  millipede with a paper towel,
> carry it outside into a night of  crickets
> and stars. I place them on a flower bed
> and go back  inside. My idea was
> to be a person who returned both things
> to  their proper place with respect.
> I see the lemon peel next  morning.
> I never understand the millipede.
> Has it found a home?  Have I?
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To  change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest  on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html  

------------------------------------------------------------------
To  change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest  on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html


------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: