[lit-ideas] Re: Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing?

  • From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 18:41:40 -0400 (EDT)

My last post today!
 
In a message dated 5/16/2014 1:01:11 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
As to why the universe is a something  rather than a mere nothing, this is 
a separate question. Which I'll answer  later.

----
 
For the record, below, the references (selected and slightly adapted) to 
 
 
Sorensen, Roy, "Nothingness", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy  
(Winter 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = 
<http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/nothingness/>.
 
which Sorensen opens with that very question -- and the title of the book  
by B. B. Rundle (of Trinity, Oxford) with Oxford. 
 
From the publisher's website:
 
http://global.oup.com/academic/product/why-there-is-something-rather-than-no
thing-9780199288663?q=Bede%20Rundle&lang=en&cc=us#
 
"The question, "Why is there something rather than nothing?," has a strong  
claim to be philosophy's central, and most perplexing, question."
 
"It has a capacity to set the head spinning which few other  philosophical 
problems can rival."
 
"B. B. Rundle challenges the stalemate between theistic and  naturalistic 
explanations with a rigorous, properly philosophical approach, and  presents 
some startlingly novel conclusions."
 
CONTENTS:
 
1. Theology and meaning
2. God and explanation
3. Causation and  necessity
4. Creation and conservation
5. Essence and existence
6.  Matter and abstractions
7. Mind and agency
8. Time and explanation
 
"A valuable and...original contribution to metaphysics as a whole and,  
above all, a welcome contrast to much recent work of a more speculative  
nature."--Erik J. Olsson, Lund University
 
Cheers,
 
Speranza
 
---

Baldwin, T. “There might be nothing”, Analysis, 56.

Bennett, Jonathan, 1982, “Spinoza's Vacuum Argument”, Midwest Studies  in 
Philosophy (Volume 5), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Carnap, Rudolf, 1932, “The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical  
Analysis of Language,” trans. Arthur 
Pap, in A. J. Ayer (ed.), Logical Positivism, New York: The Free Press,  60–
81. Originally published in German in Erkenntnis, Volume 2.

Coggins, G.
Could There Have Been Nothing? 
London: Palgrave Macmillan.
 
Erfid, D. and Stoneham, T., “The Subtraction Argument for Metaphysical  
Nihilism”, Journal of Philosophy, 102: 303–325.

Erfid, D. and Stoneham, T., “Is Metaphysical Nihilism Interesting?”,  
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 90(2): 210–231.


Lowe, E. J., “Why is There Anything at All?”, Proceedings of the  
Aristotelian Society, 70: 111–120.
 
Parfit, Derek, “The Puzzle of Reality: Why does the Universe Exist?”, in  
Metaphysics: The Big Questions, ed. Peter Van Inwagen and D. W. Zimmerman,  
Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell, 418–426.

Rundle, Bede, Why is There Something Rather than Nothing? Oxford University 
 Press.

Schmitt, Charles, 1967, “Experimental Evidence for and Against a Void: the  
Sixteenth-Century Arguments”, Isis, 58: 352–366.

Van Inwagen, Peter, 1996, “Why Is There Anything at All?”, Proceedings of  
the Aristotelian Society, 70: 95–110.

Williams, C. J. F., 1984, “The Ontological Disproof of the Vacuum”,  
Philosophy, 59: 382–384.



------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: