[lit-ideas] Re: Vegetarian -- and Metalinguistic Negation

JL, you make things too complicated.

The comma in the sentence covers it completely.

The would-be sentence "I'm not a vegetarian because I love animals" is NOT 
a sentence in this case. Because of the presence of the comma, it is a 
dependent clause and is therefore rendered to given the whole sentence the 
meaning: "the reason that I am a vegetarian is NOT because I love animals 
[big breath in] the reason that I AM a vegetarian is because I hate plants."

There is also some indicating structure in the unusual arrangement of the 
first sentence. No one would natural say "I'm a vegetarian because I love 
animals" unless they were responding to "why are you a vegetarian" on a 
grade 6 literature exam or developing basic syntactic structure as an 
"English-as-a-second-language" student. Normally, they would simply respond 
"because I love animals."

The more natural structure is "I love animals and for that reason, I'm a 
vegetarian. The important part is NOT that they are a vegetarian, but that 
they love animals. Of course, I may be wrong because I'm not right.

Paul

>
>In a message dated 8/26/2004 5:19:43 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>Scribe1865@xxxxxxx writes:
>http://www.monpa.com/index.html
>"I'm not a vegetarian because I love  animals, I'm a vegetarian because
>I
>hate plants." -  A.  Whitney Brown
>-----
>
>
>Interesting case of 'metalinguistic' negation, as L. Horn calls  it.
>
>"I'm not a vegetarian" suggests that A. Whitney Brown is _not_ a  vegetarian.
>The continuation of the phrase, "because ..." does not then _negate_
>'vegetarian', but one of the alleged reasons why A. Whitney Brown _may 
>be_  one.
>
>It's like, "Why I'm a Vegetarian".
>
>On the other hand, the title to Bertrand Russell's book, "Why I'm not a
>Christian" is _not_ metalinguistic, since Bertrand Russell was _not_ 
>a  Christian.
>
>Strictly, in terms of punctuation, I believe the quotation should go:
>
>     "I'm not a vegetarian because I love animals;
>      I'm a vegetarian because I hate plants."
>
>-- i.e. a ";" or a "." seems to work better than a simple "," --  right?
>
>Cheers,
>
>JL
>
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
>digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: