[lit-ideas] The continuation of Eco-hobgoblins
- From: Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 05:09:32 -0400
>>If you think plastic water bottles are an eco-hobgoblin, then you're
not paying attention even slightly.
You obviously misunderstood what I meant by "eco-hobgoblin." I was
referring to the media practice, either mercenary or political, of
blaming a systemic failure on individuals who have little or no power in
decision-making processes and have limited if any alternatives to the
guilt imposed upon them.
Blaming people for using bottled water, absent another source of clean
water, is a case in point. Do you think something as distant and
abstract as "ecological damage" can compete against the threat of
polluted public water supply?
If you live in a bad water area -- such as near a steel mill, an oil
refinery, or a specialty chemical plant -- you can use a Brita Filter to
save the planet or you can risk your kids getting lymphomas in their
late twenties from dichloromethane poisoning. Which do you think people
will opt for?
Like I said, it's infrastructure. Provide clean and safe water supplies
and demand for those plastic bottles will drain away . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- Follow-Ups:
- [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Eco-hobgoblins
- From: Julie Krueger
- References:
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] The continuation of Eco-hobgoblins
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Eco-hobgoblins
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Eco-hobgoblins
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Eco-hobgoblins
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Eco-hobgoblins
- [lit-ideas] Re: The continuation of Eco-hobgoblins
- From: Julie Krueger