>Indeed, I also found it gave too much of a _parliamentary_ account of >abolitionism. Indeed, I haven't seen it, JL -- thanks for the corroboration. To be fair, it wasn't meant to be more than a bio-pic of Wilberforce. And without Wilberforce (and Pitt, who encouraged him) the extra-parliamentary movement would have had a far harder time (getting a bill through parliament). The thing is, in Britain abolition was judicial and parliamentary, albeit without the support of the people it presumably would not have occurred. >I expected Wilberforce to be more of a 'man of action' Clarkson etc. did the rushing around the country, but in liaison with Wilberforce >I too thought the title was misleading. I assume they chose it because it's so well-known. Newton wrote it, yes, but he's a somewhat equivocal character (I saw the part of the movie that made him look a bit like a church custodian!, the reason's that he became a curate) http://www.anointedlinks.com/amazing_grace.html >Indeed Thomas Clarkon's role was so diminished that I don't know who he was he was really important, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Clarkson >I expect Olaudah Equiano was a 'freed slave', and I remember an 'ethnic' cast >type there, there's some doubt about his early story, but he was a slave, yes, who bought his freedom and came to England, where, basically, he could be assured of not being made a slave again. He became a leading abolitionist speaker and writer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olaudah_Equiano -- the "'ethnic' cast type" you saw is Youssou N'Dour, who is really really good; he's been very polite about the very small role in _Amazing Grace_! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Youssou_N%27Dour >but like Equiano, their role was mainly to make the British aware >that there is something like a _living_ aborigen culture I wouldn't have said that was Equiano's role. He was an independent actor within the abolition movement. Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK