[lit-ideas] Re: Test
- From: "Eric Yost" <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 03:04:55 -0500
> Donal McEvoy wrote
Now, how many didn't get it?
Robert Paul,
waking from a drugged sleep
Doesn't this canvass simply rehash the wearisome poststructuralist
argument against so-called "logocentrism," that there is no
stability to a text, that everything refers to everything without a
foundational center, that the order of the signified depends on
variations in the signifier, collapsing all binaries, and yielding a
suspicion of established intellectual categories and a skepticism
about the possibility of (1) playing the game of deconstruction well
enough so that another Sophist will be unable to deconstruct your
text, (2) having a satisfying love life, and (3) not being bald,
French, or both?
Other related posts:
