--- Lawrence Helm <lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > John, > > > > I didn't know anything about Zizek and so looked him > up on Wikipedia and > then Amazon.com. One paragraph from a review of his > The Puppet and the > Dwarf, purportedly about the "core" of Christianity, > had one paragraph that > caught my eye: "The basic attitude of the book is > fueled by contempt for > opportunistic liberals, academics, and > intellectuals, in short, the Last > Man, who drinks decaf and jogs to stay fit, and make > a habit of demanding > the highest ethical ideals from society KNOWING full > well society cannot > possibly deliver. Zizek's venom is aimed at the fact > that this very > impossibility allows intellectuals without any real > moral commitment to > wallow smug [in] their safe, cushy university jobs > and still feel good about > themselves for having demonstrated a nobler social > conscience: A life > devoted to speaking dangerously with all the > possibility of danger (and > caffeine) removed." *Slavoj Zizek is a well-known, if not iconic, Slovenian philosopher who for years was at the center of poststructuralism, postmodernism or whatever was currently fashionable in Europe. Very successful in his academic career, I believe, and I don't think he has ever faced any dangers greater than maybe drinking his coffee with real coffeine. He is an very intelligent man but not exactly the first person who I would think has the credentials to heap scorn at someone else's intellectual or moral relativism. > I've got to order that book. Thanks, John. *I hope that you don't get disappointed. You may find some interesting things there but don't expect any sort of Cleant Eastwood. > Your snippet from a dialogue between Chance & Zizek > didn't seem nearly as > promising. *Actually I found it mildly promising. I am currently reading Hegel's Lectures on Philosophy of History (at a somewhat leisurely pace) and it strikes me that Hegel might have some pointers for moving beyond the historicist/metaphysicist conundrum. At the very least, for Hegel, an intense awareness that philosophical questions are always asked within a particular historical context does not in any way imply that they are not worth asking. The answers given, while never definitive (or perhaps because of that) represent valid and necessary stages / moments in the unfolding of the Spirit toward a realization of its own truth. Will try to elaborate on this when I have finished the text. O.K. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html