[lit-ideas] Re: R. Paul is not in the bathroom

  • From: jlsperanza@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:29:11 EST

R. Paul:

Horses  run swiftly.
So, horses run.

Looks like a straightforward argument.  
--- good you mention them. My current idiom is forthwrong -- as per the  
non-Delaware "forthright negotiator" principle. One of the oddest I've ever  
heard of. 
 
---- You mean a 'correct' argument? A 'valid' one?
 
 

Try  putting it into symbolic  form.
 
---
 
and fail, but hope against hope, hope springs eternal
 
---
 
There. I tried.
 
Or you meant, "try to put it in symbolic form and actually do it". Or just  
try? If so, why the brevity?
 



As Descartes said, 'Cookie dough argued  some.'
 
-----
 
Or as Geary prefers, quoting JLS:
 
   "I sh*t, therefore I smell"
 
----
 
I missed to comment on this.
 
---



Other related posts: