[lit-ideas] Re: Pre-Sequeling
- From: "Torgeir Fjeld" <torgfje2@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 18:17:18 +0100
On 30 Apr 2004 at 12:44, Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx wrote (on Grice):
> OBJECT-LANGUAGE:
>
> 1.
>
> For any event e-1 taking place in t-1, a sequel of e-1 involves an
> event e-2, taking place in t2, such that t2>t1 (Correctly: [retronym]
> "post-sequel").
I got this.
> 2.
>
> For an event 2-1 taking place in t-1, a PRE-sequel of e-1 involves an
> event e-2 taking place in t2, such that t1>t2.
Was this supposed to be "For an event e-1..."? Teleologically it appears
as if the numbers should be reversed (so that t2>t1, ie attributing the
pre-sequel with a smaller number)?
> META-LANGUAGE (qualification).
>
> 1. For any event e-1, taking place in t-1, if the metalinguistic
> description of e-2 takes place AFTER the metalinguistic description of
> e-2, it is a sequel (or post-sequel).
Fine.
> 2. For any event e-1, taking place in t-1, if the metalinguistic
> description of e-2 taking place in t2 such that t2<t1, takes place
> AFTER the metalinguistic description of e-2, it is a PRE-sequel.
huh?
Don't stop, even if it hurts a bit.
-t
--
Torgeir Fjeld
torgfje2@xxxxxxxxxx
http://home.no.net/torgfje/
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
