[lit-ideas] Re: Please Re-Subscribe JLS
- From: Julie Krueger <juliereneb@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:20:05 -0600
Ditto -- lack of censorship has been one of the great things about this list
over the (I don't want to count how many) years. And I MISS JL's posts!
Chris -- does this mean you do have some opposition?
I wish very much that those who do or have objected (is there a better
grammatical way other than "those who do object or have objected"? That
sentence structure has long been problematic to me.) would say so, and WHY
....it would at least be enlightening to know what the beef is.
Julie Krueger
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Veronica Caley <molleo1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Amen. I don't like censorship.
>
> Veronica Caley
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Yost" <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <teme17@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 4:45 AM
> Subject: [lit-ideas] Please Re-Subscribe JLS
>
>
>
> Hi, Teemu!
>>
>> Please restore JL Speranza's posting rights to lit-ideas.
>>
>> The issue of JL's inability to post to lit-ideas has been the subject of a
>> recent thread. Everyone who took the trouble to write on the subject agreed
>> that JLS should be allowed posting rights. Dissenters were given the chance
>> to object, and no one wrote in opposition to the motion.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Eric
>>
>> on behalf of a bunch of people
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
>> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
>
Other related posts:
