Doesn't will (thought) precede action? What am I missing here? Julie Krueger On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 7:34 AM, <Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I intend to comment on Helm's second bit, sent today. Yesterday I > commented on earlier bits. I append this bit about malevolence as a bit of > a > challenge. > > While I agree with Helm that action is more primary than thought, there's > this nice Grice quote, quoting Kant, to the effect that the good will > (benevolentia) is like a jewel, or something -- the apex of the universe. > Grice > adds, "or ill-will for that matter", I think. Grice's point is that the > morality or immorality lies on ultimately, and metaphysically, on the > WILL, -- > i.e. a bit of thought? -- rather than the action. > > Oddly, Grice considered before introducing his conversational maxims that > there was a conversational principle of benevolence going on. > > In any case, just to bring will to the picture, which while not action, > and perhaps while not thought, is somewhere in the middle, or something. > > Cheers, > > JL Speranza > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html >