More on lingua adamica. As this is understood in (http://www.springerlink.com/index/gu22m546n7pn7777.pdf) _www.springerlink.com/index/gu22m546n7pn7777.pdf_ (http://www.springerlink.com/index/gu22m546n7pn7777.pdf) the lingua adamica was: a primordial language, a medium of direct communication with God .... were meant as a direct instruction of the lingua adamica. ... while _www.ascentofhumanity.com/chapter7-10.php_ (http://www.ascentofhumanity.com/chapter7-10.php) (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=related:www.ascentofhumanity.com/chapter7-10.php) suggests that "we could perhaps return to the lingua adamica[48], abandoning representational language and all the technology that rests upon it. Sounds interesting to me. Adam is often scorned on the fact that he never asked Eve's opinion when he started to name "every living creature in the Garden". A share in the proceedings would have been just fair. Good night. JL ---- _http://www.springerlink.com/content/gu22m546n7pn7777/_ (http://www.springerlink.com/content/gu22m546n7pn7777/) Two recent monographs have shown once again that John Dee is worthy of the attention of scholars from many different fields of studies, since he was himself involved in the whole spectrum of Renaissance scholarship.1 In his early career he had had a humanistic orientation and focused on mathematics but from the 1580s he gave up these endeavours and almost entirely involved himself with angel magic, that is to say spiritual séances, or in Dee’s terminology “ angelic conversations”. During these “conversations”, Dee – aided by certain rituals, paraphernalia (including a crystal ball or “shewstone”), and a medium, or “scryer” – tried to gain various pieces of information from the celestial beings. ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com