Peter writes: >Now in my experience drafting a contract---which ceases to be a draft and becomes an instrument---i.e., creates new legal relationships---when it is propery executed, which I take to be a paradigmatic case of a performative, is almost identical to the act of writing a computer program, which becomes effective only when it is executed---i.e., run --- on a computer.< The parallel looks reasonable at first, but I think it ultimately breaks down. This isn't an Austinian performative because it's no difference from signing a check or initialling an order for two gross of Geary's New Collected Poems. A new legal relationship between two or more parties is created but a performative utterance is a 'doing' simpliciter. A typical example 'I christen thee the S. S. Sea Urchin' just _is_ the christening. Whatever legal relationships fall out of a formerly unnamed ship's now having a name are beside the point. But I'm probably wrong and may not have grasped exactly what Peter wanted to say. Austin, in the face of criticism and counterexamples, could not, in the end, maintain the strict distinction he wanted to here. Robert Paul Reed College ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html