[lit-ideas] Re: High Expectations

  • From: Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:17:41 EST

Geary went:
 
>:)
 
But yes.
 
"Remember when all we had to care about was nouns and verbs?"
 
This is a cartoon from The Daily Telegraph, or the Independent: one  
troglodyte to the other in an outdoor fire next to cave. It's first page of  
Penguin, _Grammar_ by pedantic grammarian F. D. Palmer.
 
But it's true!

I'm NO linguist! And I hate grammatical categories. The linguists cannot do 
 TWO steps without providing a taxonomy: parts of blooming orations my  
bloom!
 
----- So it's NP  and   VP
 
Then they may go syntactic and say  S O V.   VS O  and  the impossibility 
of a VV O S language, etc. Fiddlesticks!
 
Go Gricean anyday!
 
--- So for a closer commentary of Geary:

In a message dated  2/28/2010 10:45:12 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
jejunejesuit.geary2@xxxxxxxxx  writes:

man's discovery of  language.  
 
---- Exactly. Actually, I'm pleased that Irene says Loren is male. I  
thought it was French for "Lauren". For FEMALE-made language see Dale Spender,  
"Manmade Language". She notes: "While a woman CAN Say, "Yesterday I f-cked 
Tim",  the implicature on the whole is that 'to f-ck' is to rape.
 
----
 
Geary:
 
>How unsettling it must have been to those first few creatures  who  
realized that out of the swarm of sounds that surrounded them -- sounds  that  
they like all animals associated with various
"states of the  moment": danger,  prey, rain, etc. -- out of such sounding, 
 
--- and f*rt. You forget the sound of f*rt. This gives the 'raspberry tart' 
 in Scots. "They gave him the raspberries", Marie Lloyd would say when 
touring in  Glasgow.
 
--- 
 
>they came to realize that with their  ability to replicate sounds  at 
will, they
could reference other things by giving  specific meanings  to specific 
sounds.
 
---
 
ODDLY, Jorge-Luis Borges is dead now. But in 1967 he was invited to Harvard 
 to deliver the Norton Eliot lectures. Nobody kept a copy. Five years ago, 
a man  (a Rumanian of course) was in the attic of Emerson Hall, and found a 
tape. He  played it and it was the SPIRIT of Borges. This Rumanian published 
the thing --  with Harvard UP, This Craft of Verse (c) The fellows of 
Harvard College.
 
In the lecture 4, Borges went:
 
              THOOOO    OOOOO     OOOOOO  RRRRNNNDDDDDD


--- He said that his FATHER, a Buenos Aires lawyer, was almost a Viking,  
and had taught him that in England, THOR was the god of The  THUUNNNNNNNDEEER.
 
Borges calls this the Thor-theory of language. You say THOOOORRRRR and you  
say almost everything!
 
Geary:

>They discovered in the unfolding  that with different sounds  they could
>reference yesterday, today,  tomorrow.  
 
Elsewhere I have referred to Bridges' Dilemma. He was an Anglican  
missionary who travelled to Buenos Aires. Since he saw so many Anglos and  
Italians 
down there, he soon got bored and ventured further south. Eventually,  he 
settled in Tierra-del-Fuego. The SPCK, Society for the Promotion of Christian  
Knowledge, was paying him well, but he needed a justifiable job. "I'll 
translate  the Gospel". Problem is,
 
          Our Father...
 
He found that the natives of the Tierra-del-Fuego did not have a name for  
'father'. He wrote back to SPCK and his contract was soon enough  terminated.
 
----
 
Geary:
 
>How gradual, but how utterly
>disconcerting to the  brightest  among them this discovery must have been. 
Words,  like
>some magic stones, they  used to break through the prison of  the present
>moment of animal consciousness, 
 
---- No such THING!

They are sphexishness personified. Man alone is antisphexishness.
 
As Hofstadter says,
 
  "People wonder about consciousness. No such thing! Take a wasp. A  wasp 
will feel so confused if you move the cricket she just dosed. There's no  way 
out of that. She is BOUND to it. I call this 'sphexishness'. On the other  
hand, if you want to know what CONSCIOUSNESS is, it's antisphexishness to 
the  highest degree!"    -- LJK
 
Geary:
 
 
>and that's made all the difference in the
>world.  Like the  first tool  makers, the first word makers chipped 
themselves
>into a  new kind of being.  
 
--- But words _are_ tools. On the other hand, a penis is NOT a tool.  I'm  
taming a drone. A drone will live about 90 days, but this one I'm  taming is 
90 days already and he looks healthy enough. A normal drone will die  when 
f-cking the queen-bee: her v-gina is made in such a way that the drone's  
prick gets cut. So a penis is NOT a tool. For they can cut your hammer, but  
surely nobody should have the cheek to cut your prick like that.
 
Geary:
 
>And it is still that magic stone of sound chipping
>us into the  invention of  ourselves.
 
(c) J. L. Speranza
 
---- Invention of yourself???
 
You mean the (c) of yourself? Ha ha!
 
Anyway, Geary -- you see how kind I am providing fruitful, exhilarating,  
semantic, and Sunday-night entertainment for you.
 
SO  ---- TOMORROW
 
             GO 
 
                    TO
 
 
                               GRICECLUB.BLOGSPOT
 
 
and leave 34,982 messages or so. You can leave comments regardless. Since  
you possibly misplaced the many invites I've been sending you, I'll send 
another  as I post this.
 
The idea is that you go to the blog, browse the TITLES of the entries, and  
comment as is your wont.
 
Alternatively, you can go to search engine, and type "Geary" and you can  
comment on the specifics blog posts I refer to you, or your brother.
 
Have fun!
 
J. L. S.
    The Villa Speranza, etc.
 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: