Paul: >I know little Hegel and less Greek, Not that you would necessarily be interested, but I found this in Wiki: _http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master-slave_dialectic_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master-slave_dialectic) The Master-Slave _dialectic_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectic) (Herrschaft und Knechtschaft, or Lordship and Bondage is a key element in _Hegel_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hegel) 's philosophy. "Man was born and history began with the first struggle, which ended with the first masters and slaves. Man is always either master or slave; and there are no real humans where there are no masters and slaves. History comes to an end when the difference between master and slave ends, when the master ceases to be master because there are no more slaves and the slave ceases to be a slave because there are no more masters. A synthesis takes place between master and slave: the integral _citizen_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen) of the universal and homogenous _state_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State) created by _Napoleon_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleon) ." That is where I believe Geary would take side (against). Geary writes: >I've often wondered whether the [slave] >was just too stupid to realize that the >[master] had to be killed, or were >[the slave is] too decent to do it? I >think the latter [Namely, that the slave >is too decent for Geary. JLS]. While it's >true, no doubt, that if the [master] didn't >need [the slave -- for the lead mines. RP], >[the master would] have killed [the servant] >long ago [by Homer's time. JLS]. It occurs to >me that without the [master], there'd be no >[slave] jobs [but there'd still be the lead >mines. JLS] -- so maybe the reason [the >slave] hasn't killed [the master] isn't >because [the slave is] too decent, but >because [the slave is] just as greedy >and selfish and self-aggrandizing as >[the master is]. You see, following "Master" Geary in this train of thought is what I called real "MMM" mental training. I'm using Hello and Goodbye in Geary's sense (""Herrschaft" is not a concept that will be obvious to our pupils. Nor is "Knechtschaft". So I propose, in these lectures, to use instead, 'hello' for the former, and 'goodbye' for the second"). Incidentally, talking of 'training', "bondage" (knechtschaft, as in "God Save The Queen", confuse their 'knavish' tricks) reminds me of "Training Rita" by Willy Russell: At the hairdresser's PATRON (to Rita): What's that book you're reading? RITA (solemny), "Of Human Bondage", by Somerset Maugham. PATRON: Oh, my husband likes them books, too. RITA (surprised). Whoa? He likes Somerset Maugham books. PATRON (sneering). Nah! He likes _bondage_ books. Cheers JLS Memphis Ministry Metaphysician Buenos Aires chapter ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com