[lit-ideas] Re: Fascinations and Meta-Fascinations

From: Donal McEvoy <donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:42:08 +0100 (BST)



________________________________
From: "Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx" <Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx>

>"I am fascinated-2 by JL's fascination-1".

Strictly, it can be argued that

"to be fascinated-2"

requires some level of 'fascination-1'. But McEvoy will disagree.>

Alright, I will.

D
Though concerned whether I am obliged-2 to be so obliged-1

References:
- [lit-ideas] Fascinations and Meta-Fascinations
  - From: Jlsperanza

Other related posts:

» [lit-ideas] Fascinations and Meta-Fascinations- Jlsperanza
» [lit-ideas] Re: Fascinations and Meta-Fascinations - Donal McEvoy