[lit-ideas] Factivity of "See" (Was: Frege)

  • From: Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:00:42 EDT

 
 
R. Henninge quotes from Frege:
 
>>Having visual impressions is ... necessary for *seeing*  things,
>>but it is not sufficient. What must be added is not anything  sensible. 
>>And it is precisely this that unlocks the outer world for us; for 
>>without this non-sensible something, each of us would remain  locked 
>>up in his inner world.



R. Paul comments: 
 
>A sentence from some work or letter in which Frege is intent on  denying
>the
>truth of 'psychologism,' i.e. he is intent on denying  that human psychology
>plays any role in logic or  mathematics).


R. Henninge replies:
 
>I don't think that's the point at all in this quote. The point goes  much
>further toward the private language arguments in the later  Wittgenstein. Can
>you feel my pain? Can you know my tree? Can we  communicate about anything?
>Remaining "locked up" in one's "inner world"  is no joke for Frege, but he
>felt, with Wittgenstein, that the way out of  the solipsistic dilemma was to
>establish the dimensions, the boundaries,  the field made up of these
>"non-sensible something"s that *is* the outer  world for us. Robert knows my
>problem with Strawson. Maybe it's my grand  problem with Anglo-Saxon or
>UK-based philosophy, Kantianism, etc. Even  Hawking. The "outer world" is too
>much taken for granted, unquestioned,  unchallenged--even by as much a
>Kantian as Strawson. The extent to which  the so-called outer world is forced
>to sing to the tune of these  Fregean-Wittgensteinian non-sensible
>form-objects, that this  "mathematical" agreement among language users
>essentially provides to  grounds for objectivity itself, has not yet been
>*kapiert*. And that's  why...



I took Frege's quote to be about the alleged 'factivity' of "see" (sehen,  in 
German)
 
Note that he speaks of 'visual', and 'see' -- which are cognates in the  
Romance languages. Only the Germanic languages make a distinction between  
'visual' and 'see', and wonder what word Frege used for 'visual'.
 
 
>>Having visual impressions is ... necessary for *seeing*  things,
>>but it is not sufficient. What must be added is not anything  sensible. 
>>And it is precisely this that unlocks the outer world for us; for 
>>without this non-sensible something, each of us would remain  locked 
>>up in his inner world.

 

The problem is tricky and was discussed in Oxford by Grice and Warnock.  
Notably in Studies in the Way of Words, Grice brings the attention to the use 
of  
'see' in
 
    Macbeth saw Banquo.
 
If 'see' is factive, then Macbeth could _not_ have seen Banquo since Banquo  
was not there to be seen. This would be a case for Frege where "each of us [or 
 Macbeth, to be more specific] remains locked up in his inner world [of 
Scottish  tragedy]."
 
The problem is that sometimes we _do_ use "see" non-factively (as in  
"Macbeth saw Banquo") -- However, rather than deny that 'see' _is_ factive, 
it's  
best to analyse that use of 'see' (as in 'Macbeth saw Banquo') as a _loose_ use 
 
of the verb.
 

Grice writes:
 
"If we all know that Macbeth hallucinated, we can quite safely say that  
Macbeth saw Banquo, even though Banquo was not there to be seen, and we should  
NOT conclude from this that an IMPLICATION [entailment, not implicature] of the 
 
_existence_ of the object said to be seen [in the seer's outer world, to use  
Frege's phrase] is NOT part of the 'conventional meaning' of the word 'see', 
nor  even (as some have done) that there is one _sense_ of the word 'see' 
which  _lacks_ this implication." (WOW, p. 44).
 
Grice was very concerned with this, as it's clear from his "Causal Theory  of 
Perception" -- only if there is an existent _cause_ to the sense-datum, can  
we say that we actually _sense_ or perceive things. We don't want to remain  
locked up in an inner world, which is Fregean for 'solipsism', methodological 
or  otherwise.
 
Cheers,
 
JL




------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: