D. Ritchie writes in his commentary of his poem: >It's hard to imagine that there was a sufficient market in >trusses. What else would they sell? Male corsets perhaps? Condoms >maybe? I've just checked and demolished one of my most cherished urban myths. "condom: origin unknown; no 18th-cent. physician named Condom or Conton has been traced though a doctor so named is often said to be the inventor of the sheath." Don't you hate, Geary, when they write, "origin unknown". Surely they should abbreviate, "origin unknown." -- meaning "unknownable" or _so far_ 'unknown'. To be known or unknown is such a _subjective_ thing that happens to an item that I can't see with what authority the OED claims that something is known or failed to be known. Surely more than enough people 'know' that Condom existed. Cheers, JL ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com