Well, I am not sure how the image is censored if we can view it right here on the Internet, is this somehow confidential ? Wondering about the definition of censorship,
Two news agencies withdrew the image, after having displayed it for a while: Agence France-Presse, and Reuters. (I think they did a public service.)
This really doesn't strike me as censorship, and I hope there's no attempt to define censorship, until those interested in defining 'mistake,' have come to a conclusion.
'This last argument, on a previous occasion of its use, was met with the ploy that I hadn’t proved “Warszawa” to be a Polish word, for I had supplied no rigorous definition of the word “word”. But it is just a Socratic sophistry to argue that a proposition may not be plainly true unless the terms in it are defined—let alone ‘rigorously’ defined. “Define your terms is a regular move for political hecklers, for writers of letters to newspapers, for idle tosspots who argue inconsequentially over their beer; after bedeviling philosophy for centuries, the Socratic argument has found its proper level; let us keep it there.'
Peter Geach, in Logic Matters [a collection of his papers]; the original article appeared in the Review of Metphysics, 1969.
Robert Paul,who just glimpsed a TV commercial for Guinness, which included Robert Frost's lines, 'from what I've tasted of desire, I hold with those who favor fire.' I missed their relevance to stout.
------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html