[lit-ideas] Re: Bush Interviewed on 60 Minutes

  • From: JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:31:13 EST

I think one of the high points of the interview (yes, I saw it  
....unbelievable), was this:
 
<<With his popularity ratings in the gutter and support for the war  
flagging, Bush said he recognizes that the war "hadn't gone as well as I had  
hoped at 
this point in time." But he said the dismal reviews do not affect his  
outlook. 
"Quite the contrary. My spirits are strong, and I'm-- I'm-- I'm-- I'm blessed 
 to be the president," he said.>>Julie Krueger
========Original Message========     Subj: [lit-ideas] Bush Interviewed on 60 
Minutes  Date: 1/15/2007 12:39:14 A.M. Central Standard Time  From: 
_andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx)   To: 
_lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(mailto:lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)   Sent on:    
PELLEY: Did you see the video of Saddam Hussein's  . . .

BUSH: I saw some of it.

PELLEY: . . .  execution?

BUSH: Yeah.

PELLEY: What did you think when you saw  that?

BUSH: I thought it was discouraging.

(...)

PELLEY:  You know better than I do that many Americans feel that your 
administration has  not 
been straight with the country, has not been honest. To those people you  say 
what?

BUSH: On what issue?

PELLEY: Well, sir . .  .

BUSH: Like the weapons of mass destruction?

PELLEY: No weapons  of mass destruction.

BUSH: Yeah.

PELLEY: No credible connection  between 9/11 and Iraq.

BUSH: Yeah.

PELLEY: The Office of  Management and Budget said this war would cost 
somewhere between $50 
billion  and $60 billion and now we're over $400 billion.

BUSH: I gotcha. I  gotcha. I gotcha.

(...)

PELLEY: But wasn't it your administration  that created the instability in 
Iraq?

Watch the interview at  
http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=2359185n

The  interview background reports that a majority of US troops now oppose the 
war  (poll in 
Army Times).

A friend told me that a national TV news story  a week ago reported that US 
troops are being 
trained without rifles. They  get a weapon only when they arrive in Iraq. 
Why? Because the US 
Army lacks  $100 million dollars and can't afford equipment for  training.

yrs,
andreas
www.andreas.com


------------------------------------------------------------------
To  change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest  on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: