[lit-ideas] Re: Barnett's Blueprint for Action

  • From: "Andy Amago" <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 09:16:16 -0400

They were a brutal regime, absolutely.   Stalin in my opinion was worse than 
Hitler.   That doesn't mean that emotions aren't complex and that people can't 
fight for their homes and their homelands and their beliefs.  The Germans also 
fought a terrific fight.  Are you saying also only because they were coerced?  
The Russians had the Germans in their country, invading them.  It's something 
Americans can't relate to.  Life is sometimes more complicated than constant 
simple answers like clashing of civilizations and nuking Iran and the need to 
fight war because war is 'natural'.  Coercion must speak to you since you think 
anyone who doesn't agree with you is a traitor and anti-American.   You want 
the U.S. to be The Hero in WWII.  Can't do that without tearing everybody else 
down.  



----- Original Message ----- 
From: Lawrence Helm 
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 9/11/2006 2:31:06 AM 
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Barnett's Blueprint for Action


The following doesn?t specifically deal with how well Stalin was liked, but it 
does run counter to Irene?s view that ?coercion was not a driving force behind 
motivation.?   

On page 163 in the chapter ?World War II, of Honor, Bowman writes ?But in all 
the totalitarian countries, fear seems to have played a much greater part in 
motivating ordinary soldiers than honor.  ?In a war during which no British 
soldier, and only one GI, was shot for cowardice, at least 15,000 German 
servicemen were executed  for dereliction of duty [while] in the first winter 
of the war on the Eastern Front in 1941-42, more than 8,000 Russian soldiers 
died not in action but shot by their own army for cowardice or desertion.  
During the battle of Stalingrad alone, another 12,000 men of the Red Army were 
put to death pour encourager les autres.? ?  [Bowman sites as his authority for 
this information, Geoffrey Wheatcroft, ?How Good Was the Good War?? Boston 
Globe, May 8, 2005.]

Lawrence

Other related posts: