They were a brutal regime, absolutely. Stalin in my opinion was worse than Hitler. That doesn't mean that emotions aren't complex and that people can't fight for their homes and their homelands and their beliefs. The Germans also fought a terrific fight. Are you saying also only because they were coerced? The Russians had the Germans in their country, invading them. It's something Americans can't relate to. Life is sometimes more complicated than constant simple answers like clashing of civilizations and nuking Iran and the need to fight war because war is 'natural'. Coercion must speak to you since you think anyone who doesn't agree with you is a traitor and anti-American. You want the U.S. to be The Hero in WWII. Can't do that without tearing everybody else down. ----- Original Message ----- From: Lawrence Helm To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: 9/11/2006 2:31:06 AM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Barnett's Blueprint for Action The following doesn?t specifically deal with how well Stalin was liked, but it does run counter to Irene?s view that ?coercion was not a driving force behind motivation.? On page 163 in the chapter ?World War II, of Honor, Bowman writes ?But in all the totalitarian countries, fear seems to have played a much greater part in motivating ordinary soldiers than honor. ?In a war during which no British soldier, and only one GI, was shot for cowardice, at least 15,000 German servicemen were executed for dereliction of duty [while] in the first winter of the war on the Eastern Front in 1941-42, more than 8,000 Russian soldiers died not in action but shot by their own army for cowardice or desertion. During the battle of Stalingrad alone, another 12,000 men of the Red Army were put to death pour encourager les autres.? ? [Bowman sites as his authority for this information, Geoffrey Wheatcroft, ?How Good Was the Good War?? Boston Globe, May 8, 2005.] Lawrence