[Linux-Anyway] Re: Hmm -- more on eth0:1

  • From: Meph Istopheles <meph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Linux-Anyway@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 12:07:36 -0800 (PST)

  Horror,

> >   Looking at various things & find that
> > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:1 is not only
> > different, being a virtual device, but ~very~ different from
> > /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0.

> >   Will anyone with more than one network via a single nic
> > (Horror) post their ifcfg-eth0:1 for comparison reasons.

> No, he will not :) I have just bog-standard one network per
> NIC, ergo eth0 and eth1.

  Sorry.  Saw that.

> I'd say I can see a couple of funnies here:

> > IPADDR="10.0.0.0-24"  <-- This should be 10.0.0.1 (or
> > whatever)

  Got that fixed right after sending the post.

> > DEVICE=eth0:0 <-- Don't know what this is used for, but I
> > think it should be the same as the file it's in: eth0:1
> > USERCTL=no

  Hadn't noticed that one, but fixed it & tried again.  Now, 
pinging .3 from the Linux box returns:

From 10.0.0.1: Redirect Host(New nexthop: 10.0.0.3) & there's 
absolutely no response from .2 from .3.

  I give up.  Once I get the manager cable now connected between 
.1 (dsl router) & .3 working, I'll edit the script to allow dhcp, 
have it assign W98's ip & hope for the best.  If it still won't 
work, fuck it.  I've spent entirely too much time failing to get 
this working again.

  Thanks Horror.

  Meph

-- 
  "I am not sure what this is, but an `F' would only dignify it."
  -English Professor
To unsubcribe send e-mail with the word unsubscribe in the body to:   
Linux-Anyway-Request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?body=unsubscribe

Other related posts: