Hi,
I’ve tested the newest UEB tables (en-ueb-g*) using NVDA source code (there is
a ticket out there suggesting that we move to the newer table set, and I’d be
happy to provide a trivial patch for it (modifying the table filename), as I
wrote the initial version of the newer table set).
If NVDA does not use multipass (pass2, pass3, pass4) opcodes but understands
context (pass1) opcode, then it might be useful to use these in UEB provided
the spec gives us room for doing it (a hyphen between numbers, for example, but
there are limitations to context opcode format).
For Jamie: Should I proceed with UEB ticket patch (modifying filename and
perhaps change the UEB entry in output table in NVDA?).
Cheers,
Joseph
From: liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Davy Kager
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 12:53 AM
To: 'liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' <liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: Regarding last UEB message: Some issues
outlined in the attached report fixed in 2.6.5
Hi,
Note that NVDA disables multi-pass rules during translation, so chances are
your results won’t be exactly the same as if you ran lou_translate directly.
Also, I’m interested in UEB only because the new functionality Mike added to
liblouis looks very useful for Dutch as well (OK, and I also like UEB because
I’m interested in US culture, though I can’t read UEB yet).
Are you still interested in improving documentation? In reviewing the UEB
patches I realized quite a bit of the docs are out of date, ambiguous, or
missing altogether. Not just for the UEB opcodes, those are actually quite well
defined. But for example my own misinterpretation of the decpoint opcode. Not
to make a whole project out of this, but it would be good to have a short list
of sections that could be improved.
Davy
Van: liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:liblouis-liblouisxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Namens Joseph Lee
Verzonden: dinsdag 15 december 2015 4:58
Aan: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Onderwerp: [liblouis-liblouisxml] Regarding last UEB message: Some issues
outlined in the attached report fixed in 2.6.5
Hi,
My brief testing with NVDA shows that some issues outlined in the report sent
earlier were fixed in LibLouis 2.6.5, and I’ve asked Jennifer to ask her
contacts at Bookshare about using LibLouis 2.6.5.
Thanks.
Cheers,
Joseph
DISCLAIMER:
De informatie verzonden met dit e-mail bericht is uitsluitend bestemd voor de
geadresseerde. Indien u niet de beoogde geadresseerde bent, verzoeken wij u
vriendelijk dit aan de afzender te melden (of via: <mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxx>
info@xxxxxxxxxx) en het origineel en eventuele kopieën te verwijderen.
The information sent in this e-mail is solely intended for the individual or
company to whom it is addressed. If you received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately (or mail to <mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxx>
info@xxxxxxxxxx) and delete the original message and possible copies.
