[liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: Minor fixes in french tables
- From: Mesar Hameed <mesar.hameed@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:37:36 +0000
Yes, I saw from the diff that you swapped the position of the include
lines.
Liblouis takes the first definition that it finds, and therefore the 0
from the include will be the wrong one, thats why the over ride was
added before the include.
I am intrested to know of the test case when you saw the wrong
definition of 0 being used, so that we can get a better understanding of
where/how it is happening.
Mesar
On Wed 25/02/15,16:32, Michel Such wrote:
> In fact, it happened because the include statement:
> include digits6DotsPlusDot6.uti
> was placed after the lines intending to overhide the 0 defined in the
> included file!
> # override zero
> digit 0 3456
> litdigit 0 3456
>
>
> Michel SUCH
For a description of the software, to download it and links to
project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com
Other related posts:
