[LandXML] Re: FW: Re: LandXML - Bentley/In Roads

  • From: "Nathan Crews" <nathan.crews@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <hugh.dixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <landxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:00:05 -0500

Michael / Hugh,
 
If you are willing to share your research, I can help get the "application 
LandXML data support" information published on LandXML.org. 
 
I can dig up detailed LandXML data support for the Autodesk products and I 
understand Bentley may a similiar document or information for InRoads, GeoPak 
and MXRoads.
 
Does anyone have a good idea on the format for this data? I started with a Word 
document with a table listing the elements in one column with a second column 
for details and notes for each, but I think it could look cleaner... Maybe a 
spread sheet or visio diagram?
 
Regards (and Happy Holidays),
 
Nathan

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: landxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Hugh Dixon 
        Sent: Mon 12/19/2005 4:43 PM 
        To: landxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
        Cc: 
        Subject: [LandXML] FW: Re: LandXML - Bentley/In Roads
        
        

        Michael,
        
        It's that first sentence that gets me!  (Although in that
        respect I am very much a "pot calling the kettle black") From
        a basic foundation it does seem that the conversion process
        is an iterative process.
        I guess I had best accept that, and get on with it.
        
        Thanks for your comments,
        Good luck with the new software!
        
        
        Hugh
        
        
        
        > > -----Original Message-----
        > > From: Ostertag, Michael [mailto:mostertag@xxxxxx]
        > > Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2005 1:09 AM
        > > To: Hugh Dixon
        > > Subject: RE: [LandXML] Re: LandXML - Bentley/In Roads
        > >
        > > Hugh--
        > >
        > > First of all, I got the vendors to give me which elements they
        > > supported and in which way they intended to use the
        > elements (I wish
        > > they would post this to their websites).
        > > Secondly, by using VBA and style sheets, we would read the XML File
        > > and write it the database in question.  Third, we would reverse the
        > > process.
        > >
        > > This would totally by pass the internal parsers and give us full
        > > control of the LandXML elements.  I guess that we looked at the
        > > elements and data in the XML file and determined the
        > intent, changed
        > > it in VBA as necessary and then wrote it to the database.  It took
        > > some time, but we finally wade through it.  Clincher is, we
        > have to do
        > > it again...we changed software.
        > >
        > > I hope this helps some.
        > >
        > > michael
        > >
        > >
        > > -----Original Message-----
        > > From: Hugh Dixon [mailto:hugh.dixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
        > > Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 2:12 PM
        > > To: Ostertag, Michael
        > > Subject: RE: [LandXML] Re: LandXML - Bentley/In Roads
        > >
        > >
        > > Thanks Michael, you are confirming what I feel.
        > > You say you have used VBA, and changed your operating
        > procedures, to
        > > "massage" the data.
        > > Can you tell us how you found out in what way the data needed
        > > "massaging"?
        > > i.e. I'm guessing you have 'decoded' the way the software you use
        > > interprets the LandXML file.
        > > It is how you got that information that interests me....
        > >
        > >
        > > Hugh Dixon
        > >
        > > > -----Original Message-----
        > > > From: Ostertag, Michael [mailto:mostertag@xxxxxx]
        > > > Sent: Friday, 16 December 2005 2:23 AM
        > > > To: Hugh Dixon
        > > > Subject: RE: [LandXML] Re: LandXML - Bentley/In Roads
        > > >
        > > > I have not used LandXML too much to exchange data between
        > different
        > > > programs, but believe that it may be necessary to develop
        > your own
        > > > style sheets to "massage" the data to desired results. I
        > > believe this
        > > > is due not necessarily to the to LandXML or the programs
        > being used
        > > > but to the slight variations in procedures by the
        > > individuals and what
        > > > data they find necessary to them.
        > > >
        > > > I have been able to exchange raw and processed data between
        > > programs,
        > > > but without some customization, we will not be able to
        > > exchange point
        > > > attribute information (TDS Attribute file).
        > > >  Some of what we have done is through VBA and some to
        > > modifications of
        > > > procedures.
        > > >
        > > > Even if LandXML Standards are excepted by both programs, there is
        > > > still interpolation of the exact meaning of each element.
        > > >
        > > > Thanks,
        > > > Michael C Ostertag, CE IV
        > > > Montana Department of Transportation Missoula Construction PO Box
        > > > 7039 MISSOULA MT 59807-7039
        > > >
        > > > -----Original Message-----
        > > > From: landxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        > > > [mailto:landxml-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Hugh Dixon
        > > > Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 5:27 PM
        > > > To: landxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        > > > Subject: [LandXML] Re: LandXML - Bentley/In Roads
        > > >
        > > >
        > > > Thankyou all for your assistance with this.
        > > > The core problem however remains.  We are trying to map
        > > objects from
        > > > out data structures into LandXML elements/attributes, and
        > then into
        > > > another product.
        > > > How we do our mapping, naturally, makes perfect sense to us
        > > > :)  There seems to be some confusion (on our and our users
        > > > part) when the second mapping is applied with data either
        > > not being as
        > > > expected, or disappearing totally.
        > > >
        > > > I believe that LINZ, a major LandXML user, provides a document
        > > > detailing what parts of LandXML they support, and how they
        > > interpret
        > > > it.
        > > > Has there been any move to encourage software
        > > providers/developers to
        > > > supply this sort of information to the wider community?
        > > > We do have this information available, although I suspect
        > it may be
        > > > difficult to find, and may not be particularly clear.
        > > > Does anyone else see a need for this information to be readily
        > > > available, and has anyone thought about a suitable format?
        > > >
        > > > Comments appreciated....
        > > >
        > > >  --
        > > >  Hugh Dixon
        > > >  www.liscad.com
        > > > 
        > > > 
        > > >
        > > >
        > >
        >
        
        

Other related posts: