[klaatumail] Re: Is It Me?
- From: "Whyrmie" <Whyrmie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <klaatumail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 05:57:22 -0400
It looks like I need to send this one again, too. Verizon had some e-mail
issues yesterday.
Sure Bill,
I can do that.
http://bit.ly/Vm1VwA
I've added the Attic version on the bottom, and unlike last time I haven't
equalized the overall volumes so now the Bullseye version shows as the
loudest, but it also looks like the loudest bits have been lowered and it
appears clipped (though it doesn't actually sound clipped). I guess
"compressed" is the word. My understanding is that this reduces the dynamic
response.
And even when you look at the quieter parts, I think the Klaatunes looks
better than even the Attic. But that might be partly because the volume of
the
Attic version is lower overall.
. . ... Scott . . ¶;-D
----- Original Message -----
From: <billmulvihill@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <klaatumail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2012 4:39 PM
Subject: [klaatumail] Re: Is It Me?
> How about a .wav comparison instead of an mp3?
>
> That would cover all the info the CD has as opposed to an mp3.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill Mulvy
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Whyrmie" <Whyrmie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: klaatumail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2012 11:57:04 AM
> Subject: [klaatumail] Re: Is It Me?
>
> So,
> I received my new copy of "Hope" and think it sounds awesome. But since I
> can't really rely on my ears or my speakers, I did a visual comparison of
> the tune "Prelude" by looking at the waveforms between the new cd and the
> Bullseye release.
> Find it here: http://bit.ly/QPHWCl
>
> As you can see (fwiw), the Klaatunes version has better dynamic response.
> I like that. I like it A LOT.
>
> . . ... Scott Teague
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "dean thut" <deansmilkco@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <klaatumail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 8:07 PM
> Subject: [klaatumail] Re: Is It Me?
>
>
>> Specifically Dee`s solo parts toward the end of Prelude. I can`t be more
>> specific until tomorrow when I get home from work.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dean Thut
>>
>>
>>>________________________________
>>> From: "Bradley, David" <David_Bradley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>To: "'klaatumail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <klaatumail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 11:30 AM
>>>Subject: [klaatumail] Re: Is It Me?
>>>
>>>Hi Dean,
>>>
>>>Give me a time index to go by and I'll do a direct comparison between the
>>>Bullseye and the Klaatunes CDs.
>>>
>>>Regards.
>>>
>>>Dave Bradley
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: klaatumail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:klaatumail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>>>Behalf
>>>Of dean thut
>>>Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2012 7:04 PM
>>>To: klaatumail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>Subject: [klaatumail] Is It Me?
>>>
>>> Hi Peoples,
>>> I think the new remastered Hope is an improvement in some ways, however
>>> it seems to me that some lead guitar parts have been turned down. Maybe
>>> it`s my system, I don`t know. But I was trying to show my son what great
>>> guitar was played on "Prelude" and I cranked it but the guitar just
>>> seemed to be part of the background...........or is it just me?
>>>
>>>Dean Thut
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
