[keiths-list] Containers planned for U.S. nuclear waste storage may corrode | Science News

  • From: Darryl McMahon <darryl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: keiths-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 07:42:33 -0500

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/containers-u-s-plans-use-nuclear-waste-storage-may-corrode

[Sigh. We know this stuff is going to take tens to hundreds of thousands of years to decay to 'safe' levels. Longer than we have a recorded history for our species. We really need to make an effort to make containment that works for more than a few decades.

Personally, given that we have the problem and have not come up with a process for making long-lived radioactive materials not radioactive other than waiting them out for the natural decay time, I'm a fan of vitrification at low density of waste to glass. We have plenty of waste glass in western society and it's relatively cheap to make more - basically sand and heat. If the radioactive material is diffused enough in the glass, it will be unattractive for future use. The glass blocks would generate heat for a long time, so I would want them placed with some space between to allow for heat dissipation. I like the idea of putting the blocks into defunct underground uranium mines, which are already naturally radioactive (though this will make them more so). Fill the mine shafts with large rocks and fill to make excavation challenging. Build in passive defence mechanisms and warning markings and devices to discourage 'tourism'. For a few hundred years, people are likely to still have some sense of our written languages and some icons on signage. Better minds should bring better ideas, recognizing we aren't trying to 'store' this waste, we want to dispose of it permanently.]


The containers the U.S. plans to use for nuclear waste storage may corrode

Groundwater exposure could cause the metal and glass binding the waste to break down



By Maria Temming

February 3, 2020 at 6:00 am

Containers that the U.S. government plans to use to store dangerous nuclear waste underground may be more vulnerable to water damage than previously thought.

Millions of liters of highly radioactive waste from the U.S. nuclear weapons program are currently held in temporary storage units across the country. The government’s game plan for permanently disposing of this material is to mix radioactive waste into glass or ceramic, seal it in stainless steel canisters and bury it deep underground. Such a nuclear waste dump may be constructed under Yucca Mountain in Nevada, but local opposition has stalled the project (SN: 1/16/02).

Now, new lab experiments reveal another potential snafu in the scheme. When a nuclear waste package is exposed to groundwater, chemical interactions between a stainless steel canister and its glass or ceramic contents may cause the materials to corrode slightly faster than expected, researchers report online January 27 in Nature Materials. That corrosion risks exposing the radioactive waste stored in the container.

Xiaolei Guo, a materials scientist at Ohio State University in Columbus, and colleagues discovered this problem by pressing pieces of stainless steel against glass or ceramic and submerging the materials in a saltwater solution, simulating groundwater exposure. When water seeped into the boundary between the stainless steel and ceramic or glass, the steel released ferrous iron, ferric iron and other components that created an acidic environment at the metal’s surface. That acidity corroded the neighboring ceramic or glass.

Some water exposure is considered inevitable while nuclear waste is entombed, says William Ebert, a nuclear materials researcher at Argonne National Laboratory in Lemont, Ill., not involved in the work. An underground nuclear waste dump is, after all, supposed to store waste securely for thousands of years. But Ebert cautions that submerging metal, glass and ceramic in saltwater in the lab is quite different from a very small amount of groundwater seeping into a steel canister. So it’s not entirely clear how much the newly identified corrosion process would jeopardize buried nuclear waste.

Guo and colleagues are investigating materials to coat the inside of a steel canister that could act as a buffer between the metal and ceramic or glass components, just in case.


--
Darryl McMahon
Freelance Project Manager (sustainable systems)
=====================================
To subscribe, unsubscribe, turn vacation mode on or off, or carry out other user-actions for this list, visit
https://www.freelists.org/list/keiths-list
Note: new climate change website is now in pre-launch
Visit https://www.10n10.ca/e/index.shtml

Other related posts:

  • » [keiths-list] Containers planned for U.S. nuclear waste storage may corrode | Science News - Darryl McMahon