[KACT] Re: Opinions on length of term for officers

  • From: wiebersd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: kact@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:42:05 -0500

I like the election idea, gets more involvement.





At 09:08 AM 4/29/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>I've set up the ListServ for KACT and subscribed all the people that had =
>an interest in helping to plan the group...once the group officially =
>begins I'll add everyone that joins.
>
>After more thought to the 2-year term that I suggested originally (to =
>provide continuity for the biennial conference), a 2 year term as =
>president-elect followed by a 2 year term as president followed by a 2 =
>year term as past president would result in a 6 year comittment on the =
>part of anyone choosing to be president...this seems like an awfully =
>long time to commit (the other offices didn't have this problem, just =
>president because of the "elect" and "past" offices).  Would it be =
>better to have all officers elected annually and then have a officer =
>dedicated to the biennal conference that is elected every other year =
>after each conference is held?  What's your thoughts?
>
>Kelly
>
>To post to the mailing list, send email to kact@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>To unsubscribe, change your settings or to search the archives, visit
http://www.freelists.org/list/kact
>



To post to the mailing list, send email to kact@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

To unsubscribe, change your settings or to search the archives, visit 
http://www.freelists.org/list/kact

Other related posts: