Yeah, this stuff is [& has been] way stupid [& seems to be getting stupider all the time]. I get email newsletters where the words which might get blocked [including virus names] are given spaces or extra characters [and often the newsletter explains this]. Then someone wrote that only the 'impoverished" newsletter writers need resort to this, because those with lots of green hire firms who have a special "in" with the SPAM filter folks and the ISP's :-( [all together now, can you say extortion?]. I did not save the link, but there was an assertion that the filtering used by major ISP's clobber one in seven messages wanted by the customer [If I had my choice, I'd have them quit this c*** entirely and spend the money on beer for the staff ;-)]. This s**** big time for the Internet, right? OK, I am not an anti-Bayesian Luddite [nor do I minimize the experience of those whose inboxes are clotted with SPAM--I have one address which is such, and others which are quite free]. I just suggest that if people want SPAM filtering they provide it on their machines [there being free and paid Bayesian clients for specific email clients, as well as for generic POP3 clients using proxy techniques], and, so, become responsible [training] and responsive [not throw away their *own* mail] by running their own filtering system. I know, hopelessly geeky for the average user... thepccat On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 02:58:35 -0800 Linda WJ <pettey-admin@xxxxxxxx> writes: [...] > Also I tried to send a message ~from~ Yahoo and kept getting an error > message. They said they wouldn't send it because of obscenity or > something. I couldn't figure out why. Finally I spotted the > problem. > I'd put something like John SMITH born (18xx-19xx) and the X's were > giving them fits. [...] To unsubscribe, send a message to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe juno_accmail" in the body or subject. OR visit //freelists.org ~*~