RE: Versions of JFW
- From: "Chris Hallsworth" <christopherh40@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:45:06 -0000
Not really. JAWS 11 works fine here and is more suitable for Windows 7
users.
-----Original Message-----
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Julie Bentley
Sent: 14 November 2009 5:33 PM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Versions of JFW
From what I am reading from all of your experiences with JAWS 11 I am
thinking that until they get the bugs worked out that JAWS 10 is much
better. What does every one think?
Julie
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
Alternative archives located at:
http://n2.nabble.com/JAWS-for-Windows-f2145279.html
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
