-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 15:31:40 -0500, Bradford Trainham <btrainham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: >Has anyone had any luck using Jfw with Forte Agent 2.0? None at all. However, 2.0 is no different than 1.93 featurewise, so feel free to continue using your 1.93 installation until the release of 2.1 later this year. How do I know? I'm on the beta test team for 2.0. It's a total re-write from the ground up in a different variant of C using a different compiler, so all the Windows stuff, while functionally identical, has different window class names, control ID's, etc., so none of the old JFW-provided scripts work. According to the beta team, the next significant release of Agent with features above and beyond those already available in 1.93 will be third quarter best effort. So unless you feel like doing the re-write of all those scripts, stick with 1.93 until 2.1 comes out and is some way toward being stable. However, this should be a wake-up call to the script-writing teams at SF/HJ to get going, if they haven't already, and start re-engineering these things so that when 2.1 *does* come out and the new features start geting implemented, that we'll still be able to use what even now without the new 2.1 features is, in my unhumble opinion, the best news and email client anywhere. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 Comment: A Member Of The TFT BBS Digital Security Initiative iQA/AwUBQNPLD4DoubDyUuYHEQKsYgCg53dVX+vyrgFqLkh2PLP6aD7hGCQAnR5C xd1GFmZ9q4GN22XfeP2v2sxU =3DRbVF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx