Re: JAWS and "latest & greatest" video cards

  • From: "Bill Gallik" <wfgallik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:08:59 -0600

Tusing writes:
> In  other words, should one wait aroundforvideocards to  "age" abit and
thus
> sacrifice speed for more guaranteed JAWS  usage?

I am certainly not trying to be argumentative here, but I do question the
validity of this question.  For one, if you need JAWS to use your PC and a
newer video card will not work with JAWS just how is it that speed is being
sacrificed since I would presume that you cannot do anything at any speed
without JAWS being available?

Secondly, unless the discussion pertains to a PC shared by a JAWS user and
other sighted users and given the nature of a typical application taking
advantage of the faster video, I'm not really sure why this would be any
kind of issue.  Correct if I am wrong (and I probably am), other than
enhancing highly graphical applications just what benefit would a faster
video component bring to a PC?

Again, I'm not trying to be argumentative; merely pointing out that perhaps
the intended use of the PC might be a primary consideration when selecting
video components.
----------------
Bill Gallik
E-Mail: wfgallik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to 
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: