RE: Different behavior between RealSpeak voices
- From: "Lisle, Ted (CHFS DMS)" <Ted.Lisle@xxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:30:27 -0400
I find I have to listen much harder, and somewhat slower, to an external
voice. I can handle Glenn at a tremendous pace, and never miss a word.
As fast as current hardware busses are, it simply may not be possible to
get the kind of tight integration and smooth phrasing from an external
voice that we can from one incorporated into the screenreader.
Ted
-----Original Message-----
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Yadiel
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 9:37 PM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Different behavior between RealSpeak voices
Yes! Although I prefer jill. "She" sounds... well... in lack of a better
phrase, more sweet and plecent to the ear. Although, not as responsive.
In
fact, I yet haven't found a voice that is as responsive as I would like.
Real Speak Solo direct or sappy 5, I still can't find a good sounding
responsive voice. That is why I use eloquence for most of my task
including
web surfing and use the real speak and sappy 5s for reading very long
documents.
Yadiel
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Dale E. Heltzer" <deheltzer@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 8:47 PM
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Different behavior between RealSpeak voices
> Some days ago I posted about how RealSpeak Daniel doesn't always
> pronounce words the way they're written.
> I've been using Samantha, and have noticed no such shortcomings - and
> "she" is much more responsive than Daniel.
>
> Anyone else notice this?
> ---
> Dale E. Heltzer
> deheltzer@xxxxxxx
>
>
> --
> JFW related links:
> JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
> Scripting mailing list:
> http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
> JFW List instructions:
> To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject
line.
> Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> Alternative archives located at:
> http://n2.nabble.com/JAWS-for-Windows-f2145279.html
>
> If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list,
or
> the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
> contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
Alternative archives located at:
http://n2.nabble.com/JAWS-for-Windows-f2145279.html
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
Alternative archives located at:
http://n2.nabble.com/JAWS-for-Windows-f2145279.html
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
