RE: Coding Opera or google chrome
- From: "Harmony Neil" <harmonylm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:34:44 +0100
You could always switch to another operating system beginning with m? I don't
mind paying extra for that one because the accessibility is built in and you
have to pay that price whether you be blind or sighted. Although granted, said
OS has a little work to do as far as getting OCR and scanning software for
reading printed documents, but otherwise the company with the initial of A all
the way, and Freedom Science fiction can go and stick their prices and bugs in
jfw elsewhere, I say.
-----Original Message-----
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
crystallogic@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 28 March 2011 16:02
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Coding Opera or google chrome
Quoting Marsha <marcatony@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi
> If the attitude is "Why not just use. . . . ." Why make new things
> accessible?
>
> Marsha
Seriously. That's a terrible attitude. I don't know how many times
I've asked people about alternatives to a certain programme, like
Adobe reader, for example, that might be screenreader-friendly, and
people just say, "oh, why not just use Adobe Reader? It's
accessible!"...as though there might not be dozens of other perfectly
logical or even personal reasons why someone might not want to use a
certain product. Back in the early 90s a lot of folks, including me,
would have said to people trying to get on board with this "newfangled
Windows thing" that they should just "keep using DOS", which was
"perfectly adequate to our needs"...
Personally it's always bothered me that we have such comparatively
little available to us, software wise. The average computer user has
got hundreds of applications to choose from that all more or less
perform the same thing; it's just the interfaces, size, etc that
differ....everyone should have this level of choice available to them
and it is a sad but inevitable fact that we don't; we're pretty much
stuck with either the most mainstream products or complete niche items
that are designed "specifically for blind users" because those are the
applications that have the most accessibility work done with them. Now
to a certain extent we have to live with this reality, but it doesnt'
mean we have to like it...we should be going out of our way to try
new programmes, make suggestions to their authors, tell otehrs on the
list what software works and what doesn't, etc.
Good work to those who have the knowledge and ability to code
additional jaws scripting.
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
Alternative archives located at:
http://n2.nabble.com/JAWS-for-Windows-f2145279.html
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
Alternative archives located at:
http://n2.nabble.com/JAWS-for-Windows-f2145279.html
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
