[jawsscripts] Re: New import compiler directive
- From: Andrew Hart <ahart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: jawsscripts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 08:40:15 -0300
On 14/03/2012 8:25 AM, Homme, James wrote:
> Hi,
> One way around this could be to include a jss file.
which is likely to give you problems with doubly defined constants
because many jss files include hjconst.jsh or other standard constant
definition files. Plus, doing so would totally break the naming
conventions of jss for script file (one that compiles to a binary) and
jsh/jsm for include files. I can see the reason for it and, the more I
think about it, it makes sense to have the directive for those curly
situations when you have nested jsb's being plunked into scope and you
want to avail yourself of functions nested below the first level and
above default.jsb.
Cheers,
Andrew.
__________�
View the list's information and change your settings at
//www.freelists.org/list/jawsscripts
Other related posts:
