[itbuff] FW: Will P2P commerce survive ?
- From: "Shantish Nayel" <shantish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <itbuff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 21:31:23 +0530
Jazz, Venk,
I'm sending this second test message to see if attachments go through the
list server.... hope this works.
Right now only the three of us are subscribed, so that we can do some
rigorous testing before the rest of the team joins in.
Shantish
-- HTML Attachment decoded to text by Listar --
-- File: __news_2000_09_13_20000913k.htm
'); document.write ('') ; document.write (''); document.write (" ");
document.write (''); document.write (''); document.write ('Send this story
toa friend'); document.write (''); document.write ("[1]
"); document.write ("") } //--> '); document.write (''); document.write ('')
; document.write (" "); document.write (''); document.write ('');
document.write ('Click for printer-friendly format'); document.write ('');
document.write ('[2]
') ; //document.write (''); //document.write('sponsored by ');
//document.write (''); } //--> Will P2P companies thrive or die?
  India.CNET.com | News | Hardware | Software | Gamecenter CNET
Search
All CNET News Hardware Software Gamecenter     CNET:
News: News story
Will P2P companies thrive or die?
By Rachel Konrad, CNET News.com
Wednesday, September 13 2000 Call it the P2P quandary: Will companies
specializing in peer-to-peer e-commerce find a path to profitability, or
willthey and their investors stagger down a path to privation?
Throughout the spring and summer, entrepreneurs and media pundits boasted
that the technology--which allows people to search for and retrieve files
from individual computers around the world--would transform the Internet and
become a lucrative investment niche. A June article in Fortune magazine
dubbed file sharing "the hot idea of the year," alerting investors to a
trendthat would "revolutionize infotech and reinvigorate the PC industry."
Chipmaking giant Intel jumped on the bandwagon last month when it said the
new Pentium 4 will contain a new architecture called "NetBurst" designed to
handle taxing tasks required by P2P technology.
"Peer-to-peer has been around for a long time, but it is now being
recognizedas the computing paradigm of the future," said Albert Yu, senior
vice president of the Intel Architecture Group.
But a series of copyright infringement lawsuits against high-profile
companies Napster and Scour have scared off venture capitalists and sapped
enthusiasm from the fledgling sector. Detractors argue that pure-play P2P
companies will never tap a significant revenue stream and that their
businessmodels are fundamentally screwy: The essence of file sharing, they
argue, is contrary to file selling and profits.
Which camp is correct? Will P2P ignite a revolution or suffer the same
ignominious fate of its business-to-consumer and business-to-business
e-commerce brethren, whose stocks soared and then crashed when the hype died
down?
Executives at P2P companies are bullish on the technology, insisting that
they're on the cutting edge of what will drive the Internet in the future.
Because P2P technology is similar to the general architecture of the
Internet, boosters say, P2P companies will not suffer the same fate of
over-hyped B2C and B2B companies. In addition, P2P technology will likely
seep into B2C and B2B e-commerce, fueling demand for companies that can
provide P2P expertise and software to the uninitiated.
P2P executives are not alone in their enthusiasm: Marc Andreessen, chairman
of Web infrastructure provider Loudcloud, likened file-sharing technology to
the Netscape Mosaic browser that he helped create. The tool transformed the
academic Web into an easy-to-use and powerful tool for consumers. Andreessen
is an investor in and avid admirer of file-swapping software such as
Gnutella. P2P goes B2B
Greg Richardson, chief executive of San Mateo, Calif.-based Quiq, said P2P
companies stand to reap a windfall as businesses increasingly transfer
purchasing and procurement online. His P2P software company, which caters to
technology and Fortune 1000 companies, announced last week that it had
raised$15 million in its second round of venture funding.
"While P2P is a hot word right now, it's only the tip of the iceberg of how
this is going to become valuable," Richardson said. "That phrase implies
talking to only one person, rather than tapping into the collective
knowledgeof this industry."
Quiq allows companies and suppliers to communicate in virtual communities.
Its software powers a portion of Web portal Ask Jeeves in which people
answerother people's questions directly, without bogging down Ask Jeeves'
human editors.
Quiq is one of many self-described P2P companies that actually work on the
fringes of the somewhat out-of-favor B2B niche. Such companies allow groups
of like-minded businesspeople to communicate in a closed circle of peers and
participate in parts auctions, confirm quotes or send downloadable
information.
For example, Provo, Utah-based NextPage enables file servers to talk to
others within multinational corporations or industries. NextPage CEO Brad
Pelo said international law firms and other businesses that need quick
accessto intellectual property are the company's prime targets.
"The technology is similar to Napster, except that within the enterprise you
can have file servers talking to each other," Pelo said. "Think of a large
law firm: It now has the ability from anyone's computer in the firm to
accessthe content of dozens of offices around the world. Content no longer
has to be centralized."
NextPage revenue comes from licensing fees for P2P-enabled servers that
companies use, as well as from annual maintenance and support fees. The same
technology could be used to speed paperwork and research during mergers and
acquisitions, Pelo theorized. Ahead of their time?
But not everyone is convinced that P2P will translate into returns on
investment. Although businesses will certainly benefit from file-sharing
technology in private networks, many experts are skeptical of pure-play P2P
companies. They characterize Napster and Scour as companies on the "bleeding
edge"--pioneers in the experimental niche whose business models may be ahead
of their time.
Despite its phenomenal popularity, Napster and Napster-like companies will
likely fail, said Steven Hoffman, senior vice president for business
management at financial services hub Home Account--and not only because of
their increasing legal burdens.
Pure P2P companies are adept at exploiting the power of file sharing,
Hoffmansaid, but they offer no valuable services for which people are
willingto pay.
"The good part about Napster and the Net in general is that there's a
pluralistic, information-sets-you-free notion," Hoffman said. "The bad part
is there's no way they can be compensated in the existing Napster model.
Somebody, somewhere, has to put out money for something, otherwise there is
no business model."
Napster could make money if it becomes a giant advertising and marketing
vehicle for banner ads, Hoffman speculated. But that's a risky strategy that
hasn't worked well for many content companies.
"iVillage didn't have the marketing or ad capabilities to keep the company
going," Hoffman said. "One example does not make for a thesis, but there are
certainly others. When you look at it in aggregate, the amount of money
spenton ads is not terribly important...Marketing per se is insufficient to
sustain a business model."
Others say that P2P companies can easily tweak their business models to
offervaluable services, such as indexing and data crunching. For example,
Napster could crunch numbers on the listening habits of its users, then sell
it to record store franchises, music publications or others willing to pay
for the data.
"Information doesn't want to be free," said Jonathan Hare, president and CEO
of Berkeley, Calif.-based Consilient, an Internet infrastructure company.
"Information wants to be freely accessible, but information itself isn't
enough to do a transaction. You have to create usable data." Profiting on
computing cycles
Several experts said P2P technology can be vastly profitable if applied to
the increasingly popular idea of shared computing cycles.
Roughly 90 percent of America's computer capacity is idle at some point
during the day, especially when people turn off the machine and go home for
the evening, said Danny Menasce, professor of computer science at George
Mason University in Fairfax, Va. P2P technology could allow companies to tap
into others' computing resources, provided people leave their computers
turned on.
Companies that provide the software to enable this could make money on the
software itself and possibly charge people to "rent" the computing capacity
of others. Several universities are experimenting with this technology,
including the University of Wisconsin at Madison's Condor project, which
allows physicists to run high-energy physics simulations on computers
locatedthroughout the campus.
"If people were able to share cycles and bid in auctions for these cycles,
that could be very profitable," Menasce said. "Many companies could then
defer buying large supercomputers or mainframes if they could buy computing
cycles on the Internet."
Despite the potential for profits, P2P companies are likely to suffer a
cruelfate, said Philip Ferneau, professor at Dartmouth's Tuck School of
Business and program director for the Foster Center for Private Equity. Many
will get bought by larger companies that want to incorporate P2P technology
in their e-commerce efforts, while others will wither as corporations usurp
the technology.
The only investors in P2P should be those who can afford to defer profits,
Ferneau said.
"This is one of those option plays," Ferneau said. "You see a big, emerging
technology and a conversion of trends, and you know you've got to be in
thereif you're going to profit from the next generation. It's obviously a
vital technology, but it's a long way from a payoff."
Read more tech news Top Tech News Zee to invest Rs 10,000 cr in hybrid fibre
network Exit 197, enter One97.com UTI treads on convergence path, plans call
center Sigma plans mega investment, to pump in Rs 300 crore by year-end
London Stock Exchange to lure more Indian software companies More India
NewsSony forecasts digital camera shipments to double Mitsubishi to recall
nearly 100,000 TVs in Japan SingTel, ThatWeb in WAP deal More Asia News HP
thinks big with Superdome servers AOL invests in hip handheld maker Study:
1.3 billion wireless Web surfers by 2004 More International News
Miss a day?
See all headlines Search India.CNET.com
Links: CNET.com •Singapore.CNET.com •Malaysia.CNET.com
•Hongkong.CNET.com •Taiwan.CNET.com •China.CNET.com
•Korea.CNET.com •CNET in Asia Home | How to advertise | Support
| Contact Us[3] | About Us
Back to top[4] Copyright ©1998-2000 Asiacontent.com. All rights
reserved. Privacy Policy.
Copyright ©1995-2000 CNET, Inc. All rights reserved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
WWW4MAIL OPTIONS:
Click here to for LINKS only. Click to reset all selections.
Check this to get Postscript version of all selected WEB document(s).
Check this to get only information on all selected WEB Document(s).
Enter maximum size of reply(s) from WWW4MAIL in bytes only (3145728 max).
Enter file part(s) to retrieve, (examples: 1, 2 6-10 ) [leave empty to get
all parts].
Extra Options:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Links ---
1 Javascript:e2()
2 Javascript:print()
3 mailto:webmaster.cnet.in@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
4 #top
Other related posts:
- » [itbuff] FW: Will P2P commerce survive ?
