[isapros] Re: VPN: Nat or Route?
- From: "Amy Babinchak" <amy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:24:14 -0400
Routes at both ends? If I use route the workstations aren't able to run
the application or ping past the ISA server. The route seems to be
working in one direction only - IN. I shouldn't need to add this network
to the windows routing table manually, should I?
________________________________
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Steve Moffat
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 3:20 PM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: VPN: Nat or Route?
You need routes at both ends....
S
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Amy Babinchak
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 9:57 AM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] VPN: Nat or Route?
When creating a site-to-site VPN how do I know whether to choose Route
or NAT?
Here's the current situation I'm working with. Need to setup
site-to-site VPN. The remote site houses an accounting package. The
local site runs a Telnet window to access it. There are multiple users
at the local site that will be using this app. The remote site needs to
be able to LPR print to the local site.
Using Route, the server can ping through to the remote network but the
workstations can't. Remote site can print. Local site can't access the
app.
Using NAT, workstations can ping through to the remote network and run
the app. But the remote site can't print to the local site.
Thanks,
Amy
Other related posts:
